Indonesia at a Crossroads: Prabowo, the Suharto Legacy, and the High-Stakes Game for Investors
Indonesia, Southeast Asia’s largest economy and a darling of emerging market investors, stands at a pivotal moment. With President-elect Prabowo Subianto set to take the helm, the nation’s vibrant democracy and promising economic trajectory are under intense scrutiny. A recent proposal by the incoming administration has sent ripples through the political landscape, raising critical questions for anyone with a stake in the country’s future. The move in question? To posthumously honour former dictator Suharto as a national hero, an act that critics fear is an attempt to whitewash a dark chapter of the nation’s history and signals a potential shift away from the democratic values that have underpinned its growth for the past quarter-century.
For the global finance community, this isn’t merely a domestic political issue. It’s a barometer of political risk, a potential harbinger of policy shifts, and a crucial factor in the complex calculus of investing in one of the world’s most dynamic markets. As Indonesia navigates the ghosts of its past, business leaders and finance professionals must ask: What does this symbolic gesture mean for the future of the Indonesian economy, its stock market, and the stability required for long-term investment?
The Shadow of the “New Order”: Understanding the Suharto Era
To grasp the weight of Prabowo’s proposal, one must understand the complicated legacy of Suharto’s 32-year rule, known as the “New Order.” From 1967 to 1998, Suharto presided over a period of significant economic development and modernization. Infrastructure was built, poverty was reduced, and Indonesia became known as one of the “Asian Tiger” economies. This is the narrative of stability and progress that supporters, including many in the political and military elite, often emphasize.
However, this development came at a staggering cost. The New Order was an authoritarian regime characterized by the suppression of dissent, systemic corruption, and widespread human rights abuses. Political opponents were jailed, freedom of the press was non-existent, and mass killings, particularly the anti-communist purges of 1965-66 that brought Suharto to power, are estimated to have claimed between 500,000 and one million lives. Transparency International has repeatedly named Suharto as one of the most corrupt leaders in modern history, with estimates of embezzled funds ranging from $15 to $35 billion.
The 1998 Asian Financial Crisis ultimately exposed the fragility of this system, leading to mass protests and Suharto’s resignation. This ushered in the “Reformasi” era—a period of democratization that, despite its challenges, has been the foundation of Indonesia’s modern, more transparent economy and a key reason for its appeal to foreign investors.
Prabowo’s Move: Political Strategy or Ideological Signal?
Prabowo Subianto, a former general and Suharto’s son-in-law during the New Order, has deep ties to this past. His recent declaration that he would work to have Suharto declared a national hero is seen by many as more than just a personal tribute. Human rights activists and political analysts view it as a deliberate act of historical revisionism. As Usman Hamid, executive director of Amnesty International Indonesia, stated, honouring Suharto “is like an effort to erase the state’s past sins” (source).
This move serves several potential purposes for the incoming president:
- Consolidating Power: By rehabilitating the image of his former father-in-law, Prabowo appeals to a nationalist base and the powerful old guard who long for the perceived certainty of the Suharto years.
- Signaling Governance Style: It could indicate a preference for a more centralized, strongman style of leadership, prioritizing economic development over democratic freedoms and civil liberties—a model that could have profound implications for the regulatory environment.
- Testing the Waters: The proposal acts as a trial balloon, gauging the reaction from civil society, political opponents, and the international community to a more assertive, authoritarian-leaning posture.
This gesture, while symbolic, has tangible implications for the world of finance and investing. The “Reformasi” era brought about crucial institutional changes—an independent central bank, anti-corruption commissions, and a more predictable legal framework—that have boosted investor confidence. Any perceived backsliding on these fronts could introduce a level of uncertainty not seen in decades.
The Economic Impact: Why Political Risk Matters for Your Portfolio
For finance professionals, the connection between political developments and market performance is direct. Political risk is a core component of economics and a key variable in any investment thesis for an emerging market. A drift towards the New Order’s playbook could impact the Indonesian economy in several ways:
1. Investor Confidence and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): International investors, particularly those from Western democracies, are increasingly wary of regimes with poor governance and human rights records. A perception of democratic backsliding could deter long-term FDI, which is critical for funding Indonesia’s ambitious infrastructure projects and driving its burgeoning financial technology sector. According to the World Bank, maintaining a stable and predictable policy environment is key to attracting the high-quality investment Indonesia needs to achieve its goal of becoming a high-income country by 2045.
2. The Stock Market and Currency Volatility: The Jakarta Stock Exchange (IDX) is sensitive to political noise. Uncertainty about future economic policy, the independence of key institutions like the central bank (Bank Indonesia), and the rule of law can lead to capital flight and downward pressure on the Indonesian Rupiah. Investors and those involved in trading will be watching closely for any policy changes that could affect market dynamics.
3. Innovation in Fintech and Banking: Indonesia’s fintech scene is one of the most vibrant in Asia. This growth has been fueled by a relatively open regulatory environment and massive investment. A more authoritarian government could impose stricter controls on technology and data, potentially stifling the innovation that has made the country a leader in digital banking and financial technology. The future of decentralized technologies like blockchain, which thrives on transparency, could also face headwinds in a less open political climate.
To illustrate the changes since the Suharto era, consider the shift in key governance and economic indicators. The table below provides a high-level comparison between the late New Order period and the recent Reformasi era.
| Indicator | Late Suharto Era (c. 1990s) | Modern Reformasi Era (c. 2020s) |
|---|---|---|
| Political System | Authoritarian, single-party dominance | Multi-party democracy |
| Press Freedom | Heavily restricted and controlled | Largely free and diverse |
| Corruption Perception | Systemic and highly centralized | Still a major issue, but with active anti-corruption bodies |
| Economic Model | State-directed, crony capitalism | Market-oriented, open to foreign investment |
| Financial Sector | Dominated by state and connected private banks | Diversified, with a booming fintech and digital banking scene |
This table highlights the fundamental structural changes that have made Indonesia a more attractive, albeit complex, destination for investment. Reverting, even rhetorically, to the former model introduces significant risk.
The Ghost of Baruch: Why a 100-Year-Old Warning Is the Most Important Lesson for Today's Investors
Navigating the Future: A Balancing Act for Indonesia
Indonesia is at a crossroads. On one path lies the continuation of the Reformasi journey—deepening democratic institutions, improving governance, and solidifying its place as a stable, rules-based player in the global economy. On the other path lies a nostalgic turn towards a past that, while offering the illusion of stability, was built on a foundation of repression and corruption.
For business leaders and investors, the coming months will be a critical observation period. Monitoring the new administration’s appointments to key economic and legal ministries will be crucial. So too will be tracking any legislative changes that affect the independence of the judiciary, the central bank, or the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK).
The rehabilitation of Suharto is more than a debate about history. It is a powerful symbol that could define the next chapter of Indonesia’s story. It forces the global finance community to re-evaluate the political risk associated with the archipelago and to consider whether the democratic guardrails that have guided its economy for 25 years will hold firm. The outcome of this ideological struggle will have lasting consequences for the nation’s economy and its standing in the world.
The 'Buy Now, Earn Later' Revolution: How Your Shopping Cart Could Build Your Stock Portfolio
Ultimately, the long-term health of Indonesia’s stock market and its attractiveness for investing depend on a delicate balance. The nation must harness its immense economic potential while upholding the democratic principles that ensure transparency, predictability, and the rule of law. Prabowo’s presidency will be defined by how he navigates this very challenge.